Transformasi Perilaku dan Budaya Akademik: Makna Generative AI Sebagai Kolaborator Vs Jalan Pintas Bagi Mahasiswa Manajemen
https://doi.org/10.70451/amanah.v4i2.1078
Keywords:
Generative AI, Academic Integrity, Moral Disengagement, Cognitive Offloading, PhenomenologyAbstract
Disrupsi teknologi Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) memunculkan perubahan perilaku dan budaya akademik mahasiswa, terutama dalam penggunaan teknologi untuk menyelesaikan tugas. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi transformasi perilaku mahasiswa Manajemen, pemaknaan batas etis penggunaan AI, serta dampaknya terhadap kolaborasi kelompok. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif fenomenologi dengan melibatkan 29 mahasiswa aktif semester V Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Palangka Raya yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner kualitatif terbuka secara daring untuk menjaga anonimitas responden, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif Miles. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya dualisme penggunaan AI. Mahasiswa memanfaatkan AI sebagai kolaborator kognitif untuk memahami instruksi dan menyelesaikan tugas, tetapi tekanan tenggat waktu mendorong praktik cognitive offloading dan moral disengagement, sehingga AI digunakan sebagai jalan pintas dalam penyelesaian tugas. Ditemukan pula rasionalisasi etis kolektif yang membatasi makna kecurangan pada pelaksanaan ujian langsung. Kondisi tersebut berdampak pada penurunan literasi mandiri dan kualitas diskusi kritis dalam kerja kelompok. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan AI tanpa batas etis berpotensi melemahkan integritas akademik dan kapasitas analitis mahasiswa. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan desain asesmen berbasis unjuk kerja dan pedoman institusional yang jelas mengenai penggunaan AI secara bertanggung jawab.
Downloads
References
Alshammari, S. H., & Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2025). An Integrated Approach Using Social Support Theory and Technology Acceptance Model to Investigate the Sustainable Use of Digital Learning Technologies. 2025, 15, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83450-z
Avraam, D., Televantou, I., Albert, A., Hitchings, A., Nicolaou, S., Papageorgiou, A., Mccrorie, P., & Nicolaou, P. (2025). Exploring the Relationship Between Learning Approaches and Problem-Based Learning: Insights From a Longitudinal Study in Medical Students. BMC Medical Education, 25, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07171-1
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bergman, D. (2026). Everyone Wants to Think They’re the Good Guy: Selective Moral Disengagement in Crimes Against National Security. Security Journal, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-026-00556-x
Bora, M. A., Permatasari, R. D., Hernando, L., Hanafie, A., Maylani, A., & Adriyanto. (2025). Pengaruh Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) terhadap Kecerdasan Kognitif Mahasiswa: Perspektif Ergonomi Kognitif. ILTEK : Jurnal Teknologi, 20(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47398/iltek.v20i02.299
Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2026). Purposeful Sampling and Saturation in Qualitative Research Methodologies: Recommendations and Review. Review of Managerial Science, 20, 579–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
Budiarto, D. S., Amanda, A., & Nordin, N. (2023). Digital Technologies Application and Competitive Advantage for MSMEs’ Sustainability and Market Performance. Ekuilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 18(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24269/ekuilibrium.v18i2.2023.pp169-178
Chakma, U., & Li, B. (2025). Ensuring Trustworthiness Using an Inductive Approach in Qualitative Educational Research: An Autoethnographic Investigation of Two Early Career Researchers Reflecting on PhD Data Analysis. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 11(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.11.2.233
Flores-Velásquez, C. H., Olivares-Zegarra, S., & Dávila-Ignacio, C. (2024). A Bibliometric Review of Studies About the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.14
Gierbolini-rivera, R. D., Silva, M. F., Silva, A. A. de P. da, Brownson, R. C., Parra, D. C., Kepper, M. M., & Eyler, A. A. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Rapid Review. Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 28, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2196/98551
He, F. X., Fanaian, M., Zhang, N. M., Lea, X., Geale, S. K., Gielis, L., Razaghi, K., & Evans, A. (2024). Academic Dishonesty in University Nursing Students: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 154, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104752
Kyambade, M., Nkurunziza, G., Namatovu, A., Tushabe, M., & Kwemarira, G. (2025). Enhancing Critical Thinking and Ethical Decision Making Through Learner-Centered Strategies in Business Education. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2588420
Mccormack, R., & Chowdhury, R. M. I. (2024). Moral Disengagement and Neutralization Techniques as Explanations of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 58(2), 630–662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12575
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
Nguyen, T. T., & Hoai, P. N. H. (2026). Managing Hallucination Risk in LLM-Generated Outputs: The Roles of Prompting Literacy, Trust Calibration, and Verification Behavior. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3816713.3820249
Nurbaeti, N. A., & Huda, T. N. (2026). Berpikir atau Bergantung? Fenomena Cognitive Offloading pada Mahasiswa Pengguna AI di Era Society 5.0. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 32(1), 124–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v32i1.2293
Nursiami, E. F. (2024). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran. Journal Of Education, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.65353/3hp61k67
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Sampling, Qualitative (Purposeful). In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 1–3). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss012.pub2
Rickwood, D. J., & Coleman-rose, C. L. (2023). The Effect of Survey Administration Mode on Youth Mental Health Measures: Social Desirability Bias and Sensitive Questions. Heliyon, 9(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20131
Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., ALotaibi, F. A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024). ChatGPT: Validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Education Sector via Ubiquitous Learning Mechanism. Computers in Human Behavior, 154, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097
Sangpom, W., & Sangpom, N. (2026). Artificial Intelligence as an Educational Decision Support System in Problem-Based Learning: Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, and Human–AI Collaboration in Higher Education. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 3(5s), 142–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v3.1074
Sanz-Tejeda, A., Domínguez-Oller, J. C., Baldaquí-Escandell, J. M., Gómez-Díaz, R., & García-Rodríguez, A. (2026). The Impact of Generative AI on Academic Reading and Writing: A Synthesis of Recent Evidence (2023–2025). Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1711718
Seevaratnam, V., Gannaway, D., & Lodge, J. (2023). Design Thinking-Learning and Lifelong Learning for Employability in the 21st Century. The Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 14(1), 182–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2023vol14no1art1631
Siswanto, K. I., & Rakha, M. (2026). Dinamika Human-AI Collaboration: Strategi Mitigasi Penurunan Kreativitas dan Berpikir Kritis pada Mahasiswa Pengguna Generative AI. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 10(2), 9569–9574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v10i1.38068
Sollner, M., Arnold, T., Benlian, A., Bretschneider, U., Knight, C., Ohly, S., Rudkowski, L., Schreiber, G., & Wendt, D. (2025). ChatGPT and Beyond: Exploring the Responsible Use of Generative AI in the Workplace. Bus Inf Syst Eng, 67(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-025-00932-8
Song, F., & Xu, B. (2026). Effects of Integrating a Structured Design Thinking Strategy Into Generative AI-Supported Design Learning on Students’ Design Achievement, Creative Self-Efficacy, and Problem-Solving Skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1847432
Tavakol, M., & Sandars, J. (2025). Twelve Tips for Using Phenomenology as a Qualitative Research Approach in Health Professions Education. Medical Teacher, 47(9), 1441–1446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2478871
Wiguna, D., Birowo, A., & Tantowi, A. A. (2026). Penguatan Literasi Digital Mendukung Implementasi Artificial Intelligence dalam Outcome-Based Education Indonesia. Journal of Data Analytics, Information, and Computer Science, 3(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70248/jdaics.v3i3.4258
Xhetani, E., & Moraes, A. J. De. (2026). Designing and Implementing a Module to Foster Critical Thinking in Management Education: An Exploration of Rationale and Methods. Journal of Education Innovation and Communication, 8(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34097/jeicom-8-1-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Roni Kurnia Sukmaputra, Meylinda Sukmani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
